Note: I asked our youth to write down any questions that they had about faith, the church, or life in general. This is a part of that series.
The original question I received from our youth was why it seems like older
children are required to belong to the church for a while before we will
baptize them. The questioner also wonders
if it has to do with accepting the Lord fully or completely.
Honestly, there is no rule about baptizing older
children. As I noted in my last blog
(Why do we Baptize Infants?), our church baptizes babies, so baptizing children
shouldn’t really be a problem either, and the reality is that we will, and we
do. It may seem like we wait for older
children for some reasons that often have more to do with the parents than the
children. Generally, children who are
not baptized fall into two groups, those who weren’t baptized simply because
the parents didn’t get around to it or weren’t going to church when the
children were born, and those whose parents wanted them to be old enough to either
choose baptism for themselves or simply be old enough to remember their baptism
when they were adults.
Parents who aren’t active in church often “forget”
to baptize their children for a variety of reasons but more than likely if
church isn’t a priority for them, then baptism probably isn’t a pressing item on
their agenda either. But when these same
parents return to church, there is no reason that their children cannot be
baptized and I have done such baptisms several times. What often happens in these cases is that
the children are already old enough to go to school. They can talk, read, write and think and so
their parents may want to make sure that they understand what is happening before
they are baptized. At some point the
children are close to the age when they can take confirmation classes and join
the church, so perhaps parents are thinking, “We’ve waited this long, why not
wait until then?” In any case, we see
parents with older children return to church and it appears that they wait for
a while before baptism. Theologically,
there is no need to wait, but whenever everyone feels “ready” then baptism can
happen.
The second group of parents have thought about it
and made a conscious decision not to have their children baptized. Some, despite our church’s belief in the
effectiveness of infant baptism, find their personal theology to be more in
line with a “believer’s baptism” (see my blog about this) and want their
children to be old enough to choose.
Other parents simply want their children to remember the experience of
being baptized. John Wesley preferred
infant baptism, but did not require it saying, “I believe infants ought to be
baptized, and this may be done by either dipping or sprinkling. If you are otherwise persuaded, be so still,
and follow your own persuasion.”[i] Remember that The United Methodist Church
came about through the merger of the Methodist Episcopal (ME) Church and the
Evangelical United Brethren (EUB) Church.
The ME Church commonly performed infant baptisms, but the EUB church
performed both infant baptism and infant dedication. In dedication, parents bring their children
to the church, and before God, to commit their lives to God and both they, and
the church, make many of the same vows that are made at baptism, but they
choose to wait until the children are older for baptism to happen. Because the remnants of both the ME and the
EUB churches remain a part of us and who we are, there are United Methodist churches
where this continues to happen.
-----
Previously:
Why do we baptize infants?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other questions and answers in this series can be found here: Ask the Pastor
To have Crossfusion delivered directly to your email, click here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other questions and answers in this series can be found here: Ask the Pastor
To have Crossfusion delivered directly to your email, click here.
[i]
Kenneth J. Collins, A Faithful Witness,
John Wesley’s Homiletical Theology (Wilmore, KY, Wesley Heritage Press,
1993), 94.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.